Ifrs Accounting Solution

Solutions to Problems and Exercises TABLE OF CONTENTS * Chapter 11 Concepts for Analysis 1-51 Concepts for Analysis 1-62 Concepts for Analysis 1-103 Concepts for Analysis 1-113 * Chapter 24 Brief Exercise 2-34 Brief Exercise 2-44 Brief Exercise 2-54 Exercise 2-35 * Chapter 36 Exercise 3-66 Exercise 3-96 Exercise 3-118 Exercise 3-1410 Exercise 3-1510 Exercise 3-1610 * chapter 412 Exercise 4-212 Exercise 4-413 Exercise 4-516 Exercise 4-1217 Exercise 4-1318 Exercise 4-1519 Problem 4-119 Problem 4-721 * Chapter 523 Exercise 5-223 Exercise 5-423 Exercise 5-1325Exercise 5-1525 Problem 5-227 * Chapter 729 Exercise 7-529 Exercise 7-730 Exercise 7-1330 Exercise 7-1531 Exercise 7-1631 Exercise 7-2432 Problem 7-834 Problem 7-1135 Problem 7-1536 * Chapter 838 Exercise 8-138 Exercise 8-1538 Exercise 8-2539 Exercise 8-2640 * chapter 942 Brief Exercise 9-242 Brief Exercise 9-442 Brief Exercise 9-742 Brief Exercise 9-843 Exercise 9-243 Exercise 9-744 Exercise 9-1245 Exercise 9-1446 Exercise 9-1947 P roblem 9-447 * Chapter 1849 Exercise 18-249 Exercise 18-450 Exercise 18-751 Exercise 18-1152 Exercise 18-1553 Exercise 18-1954Problem 18-755 Problem 18-857 * Chapter 2359 Exercise 23-159 Exercise 23-559 Exercise 23-660 Exercise 23-1160 CHAPTER 1 CA 1-5 (a)One of the committees that the AICPA established prior to the establishment of the FASB was the Committee on Accounting Procedures (CAP). The CAP, during its existence from 1939 to 1959, issued 51 Accounting Research Bulletins (ARB). In 1959, the AICPA created the Accounting Prin-ciples Board (APB) to replace the CAP. Before being replaced by the FASB, the APB released 31 official pronouncements, called APB Opinions. b)Although the ARBs issued by the CAP helped to narrow the range of alternative practices to some extent, the CAP’s problem-by-problem approach failed to provide the well-defined, structured body of accounting principles that was both needed and desired. As a result, the CAP was replaced by the APB. The APB had more authority and responsibility than did the CAP. Unfortunately, the APB was beleaguered throughout its 14-year existence. It came under fire early, charged with lack of productivity and failing to act promptly to correct alleged accounting abuses.The APB also met a lot of industry and CPA firm opposition and occasional governmental interference when tackling numerous thorny accounting issues. In fear of governmental rule making, the accounting profession investigated the ineffectiveness of the APB and replaced it with the FASB. Learning from prior experiences, the FASB has several significant differences from the APB. The FASB has: (1) smaller membership, (2) full-time, compensated membership, (3) greater autonomy, (4) increased independence, and (5) broader representation. In addition, the FASB has its own research taff and relies on the expertise of various task force groups formed for various projects. These features form the bases for the expectations of success and support f rom the public. In addition, the due process taken by the FASB in establishing financial accounting standards gives interested persons ample opportunity to make their views known. Thus, the FASB is responsive to the needs and viewpoints of the entire economic community, not just the public accounting profession. (c)The AICPA has supplemented the FASB’s efforts in the present standard-setting environment.The issue papers, which are prepared by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC), identify current financial reporting problems for specific industries and present alternative treat-ments of the issue. These papers provide the FASB with an early warning device to insure timely issuance of FASB standards, Interpretations, and Staff Positions. In situations where the FASB avoids the subject of an issue paper, AcSEC may issue a Statement of Position to provide guidance for the reporting issue. AcSEC also issues Practice Bulletins which indicate how the AICPA believes a given transaction should be reported.Recently, the role of the AICPA in standard-setting has diminished. The FASB and the AICPA agreed, that after a transition period, the AICPA and AcSEC no longer will issue authoritative accounting guidance for public companies. CA 1-6 (a)The Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) is the sponsoring organization of the FASB. The FAF selects the members of the FASB and its Advisory Council, funds their activities, and generally oversees the FASB’s activities. The FASB follows a due process in establishing a typical FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards.The following steps are usually taken: (1) A topic or project is identified and placed on the Board’s agenda. (2) A task force of experts from various sectors is assembled to define problems, issues, and alternatives related to the topic. (3) Research and analysis are conducted by the FASB technical staff. (4) A preliminary views document is drafted and released. (5) A public hearing is often held, usually 60 days after the release of the preliminary views. (6) The Board analyzes and evaluates the public response. (7) The Board deliberates on the issues and prepares an exposure draft for release. 8) After a 30-day (minimum) exposure period for public comment, the Board evaluates all of the responses received. (9) A committee studies the exposure draft in relation to the public responses, reevaluates its position, and revises the draft if necessary. (10) The full Board gives the revised draft final consideration and votes on issuance of a Standards Statement. The passage of a new accounting standard in the form of an FASB Statement requires the support of five of the seven Board members. (b)The FASB issues three major types of pronouncements: Standards and Interpretations, Financial Accounting Concepts, and Technical Bulletins.Financial accounting standards issued by the FASB are considered GAAP. In addition, the FASB also issues interpretations that rep resent modifications or extensions of existing standards and APB Opinions. These interpretations have the same authority as standards and APB Opinions in guiding current accounting practices. The Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) help the FASB to avoid the â€Å"problem-by-problem approach. † These statements set forth fundamental objectives and concepts that the Board will use in developing future standards of financial accounting and reporting.They are intended to form a cohesive set of interrelated concepts, a body of theory or a conceptual framework, that will serve as tools for solving existing and emerging problems in a consistent, sound manner. The FASB may issue a technical bulletin when there is a need for guidelines on implementing or applying FASB Standards or Interpretations, APB Opinions, Accounting Research Bulletins, or emerging issues. A technical bulletin is issued only when (1) it is not expected to cause a major change in accounting practic e for a number of enterprises, (2) its cost of implementation is low, and (3) the guidance provided by the bulletin does ot conflict with any broad fundamental accounting principle. In addition, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issues statements to provide guidance on how to account for new and unusual financial transactions that have the potential for creating diversity in reporting practices. The EITF identifies controversial accounting problems as they arise and determines whether they can be quickly resolved or whether the FASB should become involved in solving them. In essence, it becomes a â€Å"problem filter† for the FASB.Thus, it is hoped that the FASB will be able to work on more pervasive long-term problems, while the EITF deals with short-term emerging issues. CA 1-10 1. (b), (e) 2. (a) 3. (c) 4. (d) CA 1-11 1. (d) 2. (f) 3. (c) 4. (e) 5. (a) 6. (b) CHAPTER 2 BRIEF EXERCISE 2-3 (a)Equity (b)Revenues (c)Equity (d)Assets (e)Expenses (f)Losses (g)L iabilities (h)Distributions to owners (i)Gains (j)Investments by owners BRIEF EXERCISE 2-4 (a)Periodicity (b)Monetary unit (c)Going concern (d)Economic entity BRIEF EXERCISE 2-5 (a)Revenue recognition (b)Expense recognition (c)Full disclosure (d)Historical cost EXERCISE 2-3 (15–20 minutes) a)Gains, losses. (b)Liabilities. (c)Investments by owners, comprehensive income. (also possible would be revenues and gains). (d)Distributions to owners. (Note to instructor: net effect is to reduce equity and assets). (e)Comprehensive income. (also possible would be revenues and gains). (f)Assets. (g)Comprehensive income. (h)Revenues, expenses. (i)Equity. (j)Revenues. (k)Distributions to owners. (l)Comprehensive income. CHAPTER 3 EXERCISE 3-6 (10–15 minutes) 1. | Accounts Receivable| 750| | | Service Revenue| | 750| | | | | 2. | Utilities Expense| 520| | | Utilities Payable| | 520| | | | | 3. | Depreciation Expense| 400| | Accumulated Depreciation—Dental Equipment| | 400| | | | | | Interest Expense| 500| | | Interest Payable| | 500| | | | | 4. | Insurance Expense ($15,000 X 1/12)| 1,250| | | Prepaid Insurance| | 1,250| | | | | 5. | Supplies Expense ($1,600 – $400)| 1,200| | | Supplies| | 1,200| EXERCISE 3-9 (15–20 minutes) (a)| 10/15| Salaries Expense| 800| | | | Cash| | 800| | | (To record payment of October 15 payroll)| | | | | | | | | 10/17| Accounts Receivable| 2,100| | | | Service Revenue| | 2,100| | | (To record revenue for services performed for which payment has not yet been received)| | | | | | | | | 10/20| Cash| 650| | | Unearned Service Revenue| | 650| | | (To record receipt of cash for services not yet performed)| | | | | | | | (b)| 10/31| Supplies Expense| 470| | | | Supplies| | 470| | | (To record the use of supplies during October)| | | | | | | | | 10/31| Accounts Receivable| 1,650| | | | Service Revenue| | 1,650| | | (To record revenue for services performed for which payment has not yet been received)| | | | | | | | | 10/3 1| Salaries Expense| 600| | | | Salaries Payable| | 600| | | (To record liability for accrued payroll)| | | | | | | | | 10/31| Unearned Service Revenue| 400| | | | Service Revenue| | 400| | (To reduce the Unearned Service Revenue account for service that has been performed)| | | EXERCISE 3-11 (20–25 Minutes) (a)CAVAMANLIS CO. | Income Statement| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Revenues| | | Service revenue| | $12,590| Expenses| | | Salaries expense| $6,840| | Rent expense| 2,760| | Depreciation expense| 145| | Interest expense| 83| 9,828| Net Income| | $ 2,762| (b)CAVAMANLIS CO. | Statement of Retained Earnings| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Retained earnings, January 1| $11,310| Add: Net income| 2,762| Less: Dividends| 3,000| Retained earnings, December 31| $11,072| c)CAVAMANLIS CO. | Balance Sheet| December 31, 2010| Assets| | | Current Assets| | | Cash| $18,972| | Accounts receivable| 6,920| | Prepaid rent| 2,280| | Total current assets| | $28,172| Property, plant, and equipment| | | Equipment| 18,050| | Less: Accumulated depreciation| (4,895)| 13,155| Total assets| | $41,327| | | | Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity| | | Current liabilities| | | Notes payable| | $ 5,700| Accounts payable| | 4,472| Interest payable| |   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   83| Total current liabilities| | 10,255| Stockholders’ equity| | | Common Stock| $20,000| | Retained Earnings| 11,072*| 31,072|Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity| | $41,327| *Beg. Balance + Net Income – Dividends = Ending Balance $11,310 + $2,762 – $3,000 = $11,072 EXERCISE 3-14 (10–15 minutes) Sales| 340,000| | Sales Returns and Allowances| | 13,000| Sales Discounts| | 8,000| Income Summary| | 319,000| | | | Income Summary| 302,000| | Cost of Goods Sold| | 202,000| Freight-out| | 7,000| Insurance Expense| | 12,000| Rent Expense| | 20,000| Salary Expense| | 61,000| | | | Income Summary| 17,000| | Retained Earnings| | 17,000| EXERCISE 3-15 (10–1 5 minutes) (a) $5,000 ($90,000 – $85,000)(d) $95,000 ($5,000 + $90,000) b) $29,000 ($85,000 – $56,000)(e) $52,000 ($90,000 – $38,000) (c) $14,000 ($29,000 – $15,000) EXERCISE 3-16 (10–15 minutes) Sales| 390,000| | Cost of Goods Sold| | 235,700| Sales Returns and Allowances| | 12,000| Sales Discounts| | 15,000| Selling Expenses| | 16,000| Administrative Expenses| | 38,000| Income Tax Expense| | 30,000| Income Summary| | 43,300| | | | (or)| | | | | | Sales| 390,000| | Income Summary| | 390,000| | | | Income Summary| 346,700| | Cost of Goods Sold| | 235,700| Sales Returns and Allowances| | 12,000| Sales Discounts| | 15,000| Selling Expenses| | 16,000| Administrative Expenses| | 38,000|Income Tax Expense| | 30,000| | | | Income Summary| 43,300| | Retained Earnings| | 43,300| | | | Retained Earnings| 18,000| | Dividends| | 18,000| CHAPTER 4 EXERCISE 4-2 (25–35 minutes) (a)| Total net revenue:| | | | | Sales| | | $400,000| | Less: Sales discounts| | $ 7,800| | | Sales returns| | 12,400| 20,200| | Net sales| | | 379,800| | Dividend revenue| | | 71,000| | Rental revenue| | | 6,500| | Total net revenue| | | $457,300| | | | | | (b)| Net income:| | | | | Total net revenue (from a)| | | $457,300| | Expenses:| | | | | Cost of goods sold| | $184,400| | | Selling expenses| | 99,400| | Administrative expenses| | 82,500| | | Interest expense| | 12,700| | | Total expenses| | | 379,000| | Income before income tax| | | 78,300| | Income tax| | | 26,600| | Net income| | | $ 51,700| (c)| Dividends declared:| | | | | Ending retained earnings| | | $134,000| | Beginning retained earnings| | | 114,400| | Net increase| | | 19,600| | Less: Net income (from (b))| | | 51,700| | Dividends declared| | | $ 32,100| ALTERNATE SOLUTION (for (c)) | Beginning retained earnings| | | $114,400| | Add: Net income| | | 51,700| | | | | 166,100| Less: Dividends declared| | | ? | | Ending retained earnings| | | $134,000| | | | | | | Dividends declared must be $32,1 00| | | | ($166,100 – $134,000)| | | | EXERCISE 4-4 (30–35 minutes) (a)Multiple-Step Form| WEBSTER COMPANY| Income Statement| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| (In thousands, except earnings per share)| Sales| | | $96,500| Cost of goods sold| | | 63,570| Gross profit| | | 32,930| | | | | Operating Expenses| | | | Selling expenses| | | | Sales commissions| $7,980| | | Depr. of sales equipment| 6,480| | | Transportation-out| 2,690| $17,150| | Administrative expenses| | | |Officers’ salaries| 4,900| | | Depr. of office furn. and equip. | 3,960| 8,860| 26,010| Income from operations| | | 6,920| | | | | Other Revenues and Gains| | | | Rental revenue| | | 17,230| | | | 24,150| Other Expenses and Losses| | | | Interest expense| | | 1,860| | | | | Income before income tax| | | 22,290| Income tax| | | 7,580| Net income| | | $14,710| | | | | Earnings per share ($14,710 ? 40,550)| | | $. 36| (b)Single-Step Form| WEBSTER COMPANY| Income Statement| For the Year Ended Dec ember 31, 2010| (In thousands, except earnings per share)| Revenues| | | | Sales| | | $ 96,500|Rental revenue| | | 17,230| Total revenues| | | 113,730| | | | | Expenses| | | | Cost of goods sold| | | 63,570| Selling expenses| | | 17,150| Administrative expenses| | | 8,860| Interest expense| | | 1,860| Total expenses| | | 91,440| | | | | Income before income tax| | | 22,290| Income tax| | | 7,580| Net income| | | $ 14,710| | | | | Earnings per share| | | $0. 36| Note: An alternative income statement format for the single-step form is to show income tax as part of expenses, and not as a separate item. (c)Single-step: 1. Simplicity and conciseness. 2. Probably better understood by users. . Emphasis on total costs and expenses and net income. 4. Does not imply priority of one revenue or expense over another. Multiple-step: 1. Provides more information through segregation of operating and nonoperating items. 2. Expenses are matched with related revenue. Note to instructor: Studentsâ€⠄¢ answers will vary due to the nature of the question; i. e. , it asks for an opinion. However, the discussion supporting the answer should include the above points. EXERCISE 4-5 (30–35 minutes) PARNEVIK CORP. | Income Statement| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Sales Revenue| | | Sales| | $1,280,000|Less: Sales returns and allowances| $150,000| | Sales discounts| 45,000| 195,000| Net sales revenue| | 1,085,000| Cost of goods sold| | 621,000| Gross profit| | 464,000| | | | Operating Expenses| | | Selling expenses| 194,000| | Admin. and general expenses| 97,000| 291,000| Income from operations| | 173,000| Other Revenues and Gains| | | Interest revenue| | 86,000| | | 259,000| Other Expenses and Losses| | | Interest expense| | 60,000| | | | Income before tax and extraordinary item| | 199,000| Income tax ($199,000 X . 34)| | 67,660| Income before extraordinary item| | 131,340|Extraordinary item—loss from earthquake damage| 120,000| | Less: Applicable tax reduction ($ 120,000 X . 34)| 40,800| 79,200| Net income| | $ 52,140| Per share of common stock:| | | Income before extraordinary item ? ($131,340 ? 100,000)| | $1. 31*| Extraordinary item (net of tax)| | (0. 79)| Net income ($52,140 ? 100,000)| | $0. 52| *Rounded EXERCISE 4-12 (15–20 minutes) Net income:| | | Income from continuing operations before income tax| | $21,650,000| Income tax (35% X $21,650,000)| | 7,577,500| Income from continuing operations| | 14,072,500| Discontinued operations| | |Loss before income tax| $3,225,000| | Less: Applicable income tax (35%)| 1,128,750| 2,096,250| Net income| | $11,976,250| | | | Preferred dividends declared:| | $ 860,000| | | | Weighted average common shares outstanding| | 4,000,000| | | | Earnings per share| | | Income from continuing operations| | $3. 30*| Discontinued operations, net of tax| | (0. 52)**| Net income| | $2. 78***| *($14,072,500 – $860,000) ? 4,000,000. (Rounded) **$2,096,250 ? 4,000,000. (Rounded) ***($11,976,250  œ $860,000) ? 4,000,000. EXERCISE 4-13 (15–20 minutes) (a) 2010 Income before income tax$460,000Income tax (35%) 161,000 Net Income$299,000 (b)Cumulative effect for years prior to 2010: Year| Weighted Average  | FIFO| Difference| Tax Rate (35%)   | Net Effect| 2008| $370,000| $395,000| $25,000| | | 2009| 390,000| 420,000| 30,000| | | | | Total| $55,000| $19,250| $35,750| (c)| |   Ã‚  Ã‚   2010  Ã‚     |   Ã‚  Ã‚   2009  Ã‚     |   Ã‚     2008  Ã‚     | | Income before income tax| $460,000| $420,000| $395,000| | Income tax (35%)| 161,000| 147,000| 138,250| | Net income| $299,000| $273,000| $256,750| EXERCISE 4-15 (15–20 minutes) BRYANT CO. | Statement of Stockholders’ Equity| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| | Total| |Compre-hensive Income| | Retained Earnings| | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income| | Common Stock| Beginning balance| $520,000| | | | $ 90,000| | $80,000| | $350,000| Comprehensive income| | | | | | | | | | Net income *| 170,000| | $170,000| | 170,000| | | | | Other comprehensive income| | | | | | | | | | Unrealized holding loss| (50,000)| | (50,000)| | | | (50,000)| | | Comprehensive income| | | $120,000| | | | | | | Dividends| (10,000)| | | | (10,000)| |   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  | |   Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  | Ending balance| $630,000| | | | $250,000| | $30,000| | $350,000| *($750,000 – $500,000 – $80,000).SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS | PROBLEM 4-1| | DICKINSON COMPANY| Income Statement| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Sales| | $25,000,000| Cost of goods sold| | 16,000,000| Gross profit| | 9,000,000| Selling and administrative expenses| | 4,700,000| Income from operations| | 4,300,000| Other revenues and gains| | | Interest revenue| $ 70,000| | Gain on the sale of investments| 110,000| 180,000| Other expenses and losses| | | Write-off of goodwill| | 820,000| Income from continuing operations before income tax| | 3,660,000| Income ta x| | 1,244,000| Income from continuing operations| | 2,416,000|Discontinued operations| | | Loss on operations, net of tax| 90,000| | Loss on disposal, net of tax| 440,000| 530,000| Income before extraordinary item| | 1,886,000| Extraordinary item—loss from flood damage, net of tax| | 390,000| Net income| | $ 1,496,000| Earnings per share:| | | | Income from continuing operations| | $ 4. 67a| Discontinued operations| | | Loss on operations, net of tax| $(0. 18)| | Loss on disposal, net of tax| (0. 88)| (1. 06)| Income before extraordinary item| | 3. 61b| Extraordinary loss, net of tax| | | (0. 78)| Net income| | | $ 2. 83c| DICKINSON COMPANY|Retained Earnings Statement| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Retained earnings, January 1| | $ 980,000| Add: Net income| | 1,496,000| | | 2,476,000| Less: Dividends| | | Preferred stock| $ 80,000| | Common stock| 250,000| 330,000| Retained earnings, December 31| | $ 2,146,000| a$2,416,000 – $80,000| =| $4. 67| 500,000 shares| | | | | | b$1,886,000 – $80,000| =| $3. 61| 500,000 shares| | | | | | c$1,496,000 – $80,000| =| $2. 83| 500,000 shares| | | | PROBLEM 4-7| | WADE CORP. | Income Statement (Partial)| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Income from continuing operations before income tax| | $1,200,000*| Income tax| | | 456,000**| Income from continuing operations| | | 744,000| Discontinued operations| | | | Loss from operations of discontinued subsidiary| $ 90,000| | | Less: Applicable income tax reduction| 34,200| $ 55,800| | Loss from disposal of subsidiary| 100,000| | | Less: Applicable income tax reduction| 38,000| 62,000| 117,800| Income before extraordinary item| | | 626,200| Extraordinary item:| | | | Gain on condemnation| | 125,000| | Less: Applicable income tax| | 50,000| 75,000| Net income| | | $ 701,200| | | | | Per share of common stock:| | | |Income from continuing operations| | | $4. 96| Discontinued operations, net of tax| | | (0. 79)| Income before extraordinary item| | | 4. 17| Extraordinary item, net of tax| | | 0. 50| Net income ($701,200 ? 150,000)| | | $4. 67| *Computation of income from continuing operations before income tax:| | As previously stated| | | $1,210,000| Loss on sale of equipment [$40,000 – ($80,000 – $30,000)]| (10,000)| Restated| | | $1,200,000| | | | | **Computation of income tax expense:| | | $1,200,000 X . 38 = $456,000| | | | Note: The error related to the intangible asset was correctly charged to retained earnings.CHAPTER 5 EXERCISE 5-2 (15–20 minutes) 1. | h. | 11. | b. | 2. | d. | 12. | f. | 3. | f. | 13. | a. | 4. | f. | 14. | h. | 5| c. | 15. | c. | 6. | a. | 16. | b. | 7. | f. | 17. | a. | 8. | g. | 18. | a. | 9. | a. | 19. | g. | 10. | a. | 20. | f. | EXERCISE 5-4 (30–35 minutes) GULISTAN INC. | Balance Sheet| December 31, 2010| Assets| Current assets| | | | Cash| $XXX| | | Less: Cash restricted for plant expansion| XXX| $XXX| | Accounts receivable| XXX| | | Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts| XXX| XXX| | Notes receivable| | XXX| | Receivables—officers| | XXX| | Inventories| | | | Finished goods| XXX| | |Work in process| XXX| | | Raw materials| XXX| XXX| | Total current assets| | | $XXX| | | | | Long-term investments| | | | Preferred stock investments| | XXX| | Land held for future plant site| | XXX| | Cash restricted for plant expansion| | XXX| | Total long-term investments| | | XXX| | | | | Property, plant, and equipment| | | | Buildings| | XXX| | Less: Accum. depreciation— buildings| | XXX| XXX| | | | | Intangible assets| | | | Copyrights| | | XXX| Total assets| | | $XXX| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity| Current liabilities| | | | | Accrued salaries payable| | $XXX| | |Notes payable, short-term| | XXX| | | Unearned subscriptions revenue| | XXX| | | Unearned rent revenue| | XXX| | | Total current liabilities| | | | $XXX| | | | | | Long-term debt| | | | | Bonds payable, due in four years| | | $XXX| | Less: Discount on bonds payable| | | (XXX)| XXX| Total liabilities| | | | XXX| | | | | | Stockholders’ equity| | | | | Capital stock:| | | | | Common stock| | XXX| | | Additional paid-in capital:| | | | | Paid in capital in excess of par—common stock| | XXX| | | Total paid-in capital| | | XXX| | Retained earnings| | | XXX| |Total paid-in capital and retained earnings| | | XXX| | Less: Treasury stock, at cost| | | (XXX)| | Total stockholders’ equity| | | | XXX| Total liabilities and stock- holders’ equity| | | | $XXX| Note to instructor: An assumption made here is that cash included the cash restricted for plant expansion. If it did not, then a subtraction from cash would not be necessary or the cash balance would be â€Å"grossed up† and then the cash restricted for plant expansion deducted. EXERCISE 5-13 (15–20 minutes) (a)| 4. | (f)| 1. | (k)| 1. | (b)| 3. | (g)| 5. | (l)| 2. | (c)| 4. | (h)| 4. (m)| 2. | (d)| 3. | (i)| 5. | | | (e)| 1. | (j)| 4. | | | EXERCISE 5-15 (25â₠¬â€œ35 minutes) (a)SONDERGAARD CORPORATION| Statement of Cash Flows| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Cash flows from operating activities| | | Net income| | $160,000| Adjustments to reconcile net income| | | to net cash provided by operating | | | activities:| | | Depreciation expense| $17,000| | Loss on sale of investments| 7,000| | Decrease in accounts receivable| 5,000| | Decrease in current liabilities| (17,000)| 12,000| Net cash provided by operating activities| | 172,000| Cash flows from investing activities| | |Sale of investments| | | [($74,000 – $52,000) – $7,000]| 15,000| | Purchase of equipment| (58,000)| | Net cash used by investing activities| | (43,000)| Cash flows from financing activities| | | Payment of cash dividends| | (50,000)| Net increase in cash| | 79,000| Cash at beginning of year| | 78,000| Cash at end of year| | $157,000| (b)Free Cash Flow Analysis| Net cash provided by operating activities| | $172,000| Less: Purchase of equipment| | (58 ,000)| Dividends| | (50,000)| Free cash flow| | $ 64,000| | PROBLEM 5-2| | MONTOYA, INC. | Balance Sheet| December 31, 2010|Assets| Current assets| | | | Cash| | $ 360,000| | Trading securities| | 121,000| | Notes receivable| | 445,700| | Income taxes receivable| | 97,630| | Inventories| | 239,800| | Prepaid expenses| | 87,920| | Total current assets| | | $1,352,050| | | | | Property, plant, and equipment| | | | Land| | $ 480,000| | Building| $1,640,000| | | Less: Accum. depreciation— building| 270,200| 1,369,800| | Equipment| 1,470,000| | | Less: Accum. depreciation— equipment| 292,000| 1,178,000| 3,027,800| | | | | Intangible assets| | | | Goodwill| | | 125,000| Total assets| | | $4,504,850|Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity| Current liabilities| | | | Accounts payable| | $ 490,000| | Notes payable to banks| | 265,000| | Payroll taxes payable| | 177,591| | Taxes payable| | 98,362| | Rent payable| | 45,000| | Total current liabilities| | | $1,075,953| | | | | Long-term liabilities| | | | Unsecured notes payable| | | | (long-term)| | $1,600,000| | Bonds payable| $300,000| | | Less:Discount on bonds payable| 15,000| 285,000| | Long-term rental obligations| | 480,000| 2,365,000| Total liabilities| | | 3,440,953| | | | | Stockholders’ equity| | | | Capital stock| | | |Preferred stock, $10 par; 20,000 shares authorized, 15,000 shares issued| $150,000| | | Common stock, $1 par; 400,000 shares authorized, 200,000 issued| 200,000| $350,000| | Retained earnings ($1,063,897 – $350,000)| | 713,897| | Total stockholders’ equity ($4,504,850 – $3,440,953)| | | 1,063,897| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity| | | $4,504,850| CHAPTER 7 EXERCISE 7-5 (15–20 minutes) (a)| 1. | June 3| Accounts Receivable—Arquette| 2,000| | | | | Sales| | 2,000| | | | | | | | | June 12| Cash| 1,960| | | | | Sales Discounts ($2,000 X 2%)| 40| | | | | Accounts Receivable—Arquette| | 2,000| | | | | | | 2. | June 3| Accounts Receivable—Arquette| 1,960| | | | | Sales ($2,000 X 98%)| | 1,960| | | | | | | | | June 12| Cash| 1,960| | | | | Accounts Receivable—Arquette| | 1,960| (b)| July 29| Cash| 2,000| | | | Accounts Receivable—Arquette| | 1,960| | | Sales Discounts Forfeited| | 40| | | | | | | (Note to instructor: Sales discounts forfeited could have been recog-nized at the time the discount period lapsed. The company, however, would probably not record this forfeiture until final cash settlement. )| EXERCISE 7-7 (10–15 minutes) (a)| Bad Debt Expense| 7,500| | | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts| | 7,500*| | | | | . 01 X ($800,000 – $50,000) = $7,500| | | | | | | (b)| Bad Debt Expense| 6,000| | | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts| | 6,000*| | | | | *Step 1:. 05 X $160,000 = $8,000 (desired credit balance in Allowance account) Step 2:$8,000 – $2,000 = $6,000 (required credit entry to bring allowance account to $8,000 credit balance) EXERCISE 7-13 (10– 15 minutes) (a)| Cash| 290,000| | | Finance Charge| 10,000*| | | Notes Payable| | 300,000| | | | | *2% X $500,000 = $10,000| | | | | | | (b)| Cash| 350,000| | | Accounts Receivable| | 350,000| EXERCISE 7-13 (Continued) (c)| Notes Payable| 300,000| | | Interest Expense| 7,500*| | Cash| | 307,500| | | | | *10% X $300,000 X 3/12 = $7,500| | | EXERCISE 7-15 (10–15 minutes) Computation of net proceeds:| Cash received| | $190,000| Less: Recourse liability| | 2,000| Net proceeds| | $188,000| Computation of gain or loss:| Carrying value| | $200,000| Net proceeds| | 188,000| Loss on sale of receivables| | $ 12,000| The following journal entry would be made:| Cash| $190,000| | Loss on Sale of Receivables| 12,000| | Recourse Liability| | 2,000| Accounts Receivable| | 200,000| EXERCISE 7-16 (15–20 minutes) (a)| To be recorded as a sale, all of the following conditions would be met:| | | | 1. The transferred asset has been isolated from the transferor (put beyond reach of the trans feror and its creditors). | | | | | 2. | The transferees have obtained the right to pledge or to exchange either the transferred assets or beneficial interests in the trans-ferred assets. | | | | | 3. | The transferor does not maintain effective control over the trans-ferred assets through an agreement to repurchase or redeem them before their maturity. | (b)| Computation of net proceeds:| | Cash received ($250,000 X 94%)| $235,000| | | Due from factor ($250,000 X 4%)| 10,000| $245,000| | Less: Recourse obligation| | 3,000| Net proceeds| | $242,000| | Computation of gain or loss:| | Carrying value| | $250,000| | Net proceeds| | 242,000| | Loss on sale of receivables| | $ 8,000| | The following journal entry would be made:| | Cash| $235,000| | | Due from Factor| 10,000| | | Loss on Sale of Receivables| 8,000| | | Recourse Liability| | 3,000| | Accounts Receivable| | 250,000| *EXERCISE 7-24 (15–20 minutes) (a)KIPLING COMPANY| Bank Reconciliation | July 31| Balance per bank stat ement, July 31| | $ 8,650| Add: Deposits in transit| | 2,850a| Deduct: Outstanding checks| | (1,100)b| Correct cash balance, July 31| | $10,400| | | Balance per books, July 31| | $ 9,250| Add: Collection of note| | 1,500| Less: Bank service charge| $ 15| | NSF check| 335| (350)| Corrected cash balance, July 31| | $10,400| aComputation of deposits in transit| | | Deposits per books| | $5,810| Deposits per bank in July| $ 4,500| | Less deposits in transit (June)|   (1,540)| | Deposits mailed and received in July| | (2,960)| Deposits in transit, July 31| | $2,850| bComputation of outstanding checks| | | Checks written per books| | $3,100| Checks cleared by bank in July| $ 4,000| | Less outstanding checks (June)*| (2,000)| |Checks written and cleared in July| | (2,000)| Outstanding checks, July 31| | $1,100| *Assumed to clear bank in July (b)| Cash| 1,150| | | Office Expenses—Bank Charges| 15| | | Accounts Receivable| 335| | | Notes Receivable| | 1,500| | PROBLEM 7-8| | 10/1/10 | Notes Receivable| 120,000| | | Sales| | 120,000| | | | | 12/31/10| Interest Receivable| 2,400*| | | Interest Revenue| | 2,400| | | | | *$120,000 X . 08 X 3/12 = $2,400| | | | | | 10/1/11| Cash| 9,600*| | | Interest Receivable| | 2,400| | Interest Revenue| | 7,200**| | | | | *$120,000 X . 08 = $9,600**$120,000 X . 08 X 9/12 = $7,200| | | | | | 2/31/11| Interest Receivable| 2,400| | | Interest Revenue| | 2,400| | | | | 10/1/12| Cash| 9,600| | | Interest Receivable| | 2,400| | Interest Revenue| | 7,200| | | | | | Cash| 120,000| | | Notes Receivable| | 120,000| Note: Entries at 10/1/11 and 10/1/12 assumes reversing entries were not made on January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. | PROBLEM 7-11| | SANDBURG COMPANY| Income Statement Effects| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010| Expenses resulting from accounts receivable| | | | | assigned (Schedule 1)| | | | $22,320| Loss resulting from accounts receivable| | | | | sold ($300,000 – $270,000)| | | | 30,000|Total expenses| | | | $52, 320| Schedule 1 Computation of Expense| for Accounts Receivable Assigned| Assignment expense:| | | | | Accounts receivable assigned| | $400,000| | | | | X 80%| | | Advance by Keller Finance Company| | 320,000| | | | | X 3%| | $ 9,600| Interest expense| | | | 12,720| Total expenses| | | | $22,320| | *PROBLEM 7-15| | (a)The entries for the issuance of the note on January 1, 2010: The present value of the note is: $1,200,000 X . 68058 = $816,700 (Rounded by $4). | Botosan Company (Debtor):| | | | Cash| 816,700| | | Discount on Notes Payable| 383,300| | | Note Payable| | 1,200,000| | | | | National Organization Bank (Creditor):| | | | Notes Receivable| 1,200,000| | | Discount on Notes Receivable| | 383,300| | Cash| | 816,700| (b)The amortization schedule for this note is: SCHEDULE FOR INTEREST AND DISCOUNT AMORTIZATION— EFFECTIVE-INTEREST METHOD $1,200,000 Note Issued to Yield 8% Date| | Cash Paid| | Interest Expense| | Discount Amortized| | Carrying Amount of Note| 1/1/10| | | | | | | | $ 816,700| 12/31/10| | $0| | $ 65,336*| | $ 65,336| | 882,036**| 12/31/11| | 0| | 70,563| | 70,563| | 952,599| 12/31/12| | 0| | 76,208| | 76,208| | 1,028,807| 12/31/13| | 0| | 82,305| | 82,305| | 1,111,112| 2/31/14| | 0| | 88,888| | 88,888| | 1,200,000| Total| | $0| | $383,300| | $383,300| | | *$816,700 X 8% = $65,336. **$816,700 + $65,336 = $882,036. (c)The note can be considered to be impaired only when it is probable that, based on current information and events, National Organization Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan. (d)| The loss is computed as follows:| | | | Carrying amount of loan (12/31/11)| | $952,599a| | Less: Present value of $800,000 due in 3 years at 8%| |   (635,064)b| | Loss due to impairment| | $317,535| | | | | aSee amortization schedule from answer (b) on page 7-66. | | | b$800,000 X . 79383 = $635,064. | | | | December 31, 2011| | National Organization Bank (Cred itor):| | | | Bad Debt Expense| 317,535| | | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts| | 317,535| Note: Botosan Company (Debtor) has no entry. CHAPTER 8 EXERCISE 8-1 (15–20 minutes) Items 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 13, 14, 16, and 17 would be reported as inventory in the financial statements. The following items would not be reported as inventory: 1. Cost of goods sold in the income statement. 4. Not reported in the financial statements. 6. Cost of goods sold in the income statement. . Cost of goods sold in the income statement. 9. Interest expense in the income statement. 11. Advertising expense in the income statement. 12. Office supplies in the current assets section of the balance sheet. 15. Not reported in the financial statements. 18. Short-term investments in the current asset section of the balance sheet. EXERCISE 8-15 (15–20 minutes) (a)ESPLANADE COMPANY| Computation of Inventory for Product| BAP Under FIFO Inventory Method| March 31, 2010| | Units| | Unit Cost| | Total Cost| Mar ch 26, 2010| 600| | $12. 00| | $ 7,200| February 16, 2010| 800| | 11. 00| | 8,800|January 25, 2010 (portion)| 100| | 10. 00| | 1,000| March 31, 2010, inventory | 1,500| | | | $17,000| (b)ESPLANADE COMPANY| Computation of Inventory for Product| BAP Under LIFO Inventory Method| March 31, 2010| | Units| | Unit Cost| | Total Cost| Beginning inventory| 600| | $8. 00| | $ 4,800| January 5, 2010 (portion)| 900| | 9. 00| | 8,100| March 31, 2010, inventory| 1,500| | | | $12,900| (c)ESPLANADE COMPANY| Computation of Inventory for Product| BAP Under Weighted Average Inventory Method| March 31, 2010| | Units| | Unit Cost| | Total Cost| Beginning inventory| 600| | $ 8. 0| | $ 4,800| January 5, 2010| 1,100| | 9. 00| | 9,900| January 25, 2010| 1,300| | 10. 00| | 13,000| February 16, 2010| 800| | 11. 00| | 8,800| March 26, 2010| 600| | 12. 00| | 7,200| | 4,400| | | | $43,700| | | | | | | Weighted average cost| | | | | | ($43,700 ? 4,400)| | | $ 9. 93*| | | | | | | | | March 31, 2010, inventory| 1,5 00| | $ 9. 93| | $14,895| *Rounded off. EXERCISE 8-25 (20–25 minutes) | Current $| | Price Index| | Base Year $| | Change from Prior Year| 2007| $ 80,000| | 1. 00| | $ 80,000| | —| 2008| 111,300| | 1. 05| | 106,000| | +$26,000| 2009| 108,000| | 1. 0| | 90,000| | (16,000)| 2010| 122,200| | 1. 30| | 94,000| | +4,000| 2011| 147,000| | 1. 40| | 105,000| | +11,000| 2012| 176,900| | 1. 45| | 122,000| | +17,000| Ending Inventory—Dollar-value LIFO: 2007| $80,000| | | 2011| $80,000 @ 1. 00 =| $ 80,000| | | | | | 10,000 @ 1. 05 = | 10,500| 2008| $80,000 @ 1. 00 =| $ 80,000| | | 4,000 @ 1. 30 =| 5,200| | 26,000 @ 1. 05 =| 27,300| | | 11,000 @ 1. 40 = | 15,400| | | $107,300| | | | $111,100| | | | | | | | 2009| $80,000 @ 1. 00 =| $ 80,000| | 2012| $80,000 @ 1. 00 =| $ 80,000| | 10,000 @ 1. 05 =| 10,500| | | 10,000 @ 1. 5 =| 10,500| | | $ 90,500| | | 4,000 @ 1. 30 =| 5,200| | | | | | 11,000 @ 1. 40 =| 15,400| 2010| $80,000 @ 1. 00 =| $ 80,000| | | 17,000 @ 1. 45 =| 24,650| | 10,000 @ 1. 05 =| 10,500| | | | $135,750| | 4,000 @ 1. 30 =| 5,200| | | | | | | $ 95,700| | | | | EXERCISE 8-26 (15–20 minutes) Date| | Current $| | Price Index| | Base-Year $| | Change from Prior Year| Dec. 31, 2007| | $ 70,000| | 1. 00| | $70,000| | —| Dec. 31, 2008| | 88,200| | 1. 05| | 84,000| | +$14,000| Dec. 31, 2009| | 95,120| | 1. 16| | 82,000| | (2,000)| Dec. 31, 2010| | 108,000| | 1. 0| | 90,000| | +8,000| Dec. 31, 2011| | 100,000| | 1. 25| | 80,000| | (10,000)| Ending Inventory—Dollar-value LIFO: Dec. 31, 2007| $70,000| | | | | Dec. 31, 2008| $70,000 @ 1. 00 =| $70,000| | 14,000 @ 1. 05 =| 14,700| | | $84,700| | | | Dec. 31, 2009| $70,000 @ 1. 00 =| $70,000| | 12,000 @ 1. 05 =| 12,600| | | $82,600| | | | Dec. 31, 2010| $70,000 @ 1. 00 =| $70,000| | 12,000 @ 1. 05 =| 12,600| | 8,000 @ 1. 20 =| 9,600| | | $92,200| | | | Dec. 31, 2011| $70,000 @ 1. 00 =| $70,000| | 10,000 @ 1. 05 =| 10,500| | | $80,500| CHAPTER 9 BRIEF EXERCISE 9-2 Item| | Cost| | Design ated Market| |LCM| Jokers| | $2,000| | $2,050| | $2,000| Penguins| | 5,000| | 4,950| | 4,950| Riddlers| | 4,400| | 4,550| | 4,400| Scarecrows| | 3,200| | 3,070| | 3,070| BRIEF EXERCISE 9-4 Group| | Number of CDs| | Sales Price per CD| | Total Sales Price| | Relative Sales Price| | Total Cost| | Cost Allocated to CDs| | Cost per CD| 1| | 100| | $ 5| | $ 500| | 5/100*| X| $8,000| =| $ 400| | $ 4**| 2| | 800| | $10| | 8,000| | 80/100| X| $8,000| =| 6,400| | $ 8| 3| | 100| | $15| | 1,500| | 15/100| X| $8,000| =| 1,200| | $12| | | | | | | $10,000| | | | | | $8,000| | | $500/$10,000 = 5/100**$400/100 = $4 BRIEF EXERCISE 9-7 Beginning inventory| | $150,000| Purchases| | 500,000| Cost of goods available| | 650,000| Sales| $700,000| | Less gross profit (35% X 700,000)| 245,000| | Estimated cost of goods sold| | 455,000| Estimated ending inventory destroyed in fire| | $195,000| BRIEF EXERCISE 9-8 | Cost| | Retail| Beginning inventory| $ 12,000| | $ 20,000| Net purchases| 120,000| | 170,000| N et markups|   | | 10,000| Totals| $132,000| | 200,000| Deduct:| | | | Net markdowns| | | 7,000| Sales| | | 147,000| Ending inventory at retail| | | $ 46,000| | | | |Cost-to-retail ratio: $132,000 ? $200,000 = 66%| | | | Ending inventory at lower-of cost-or-market (66% X $46,000) = $30,360 EXERCISE 9-2 (10–15 minutes) Item| | Net Realizable Value (Ceiling)| | Net Realizable Value Less Normal Profit (Floor)| | Replacement Cost| | Designated Market| | Cost| | LCM| D| | $90*| | $70**| | $120| | $90| | $75| | $75| E| | 80| | 60| | 72| | 72| | 80| | 72| F| | 60| | 40| | 70| | 60| | 80| | 60| G| | 55| | 35| | 30| | 35| | 80| | 35| H| | 80| | 60| | 70| | 70| | 50| | 50| I| | 60| | 40| | 30| | 40| | 36| | 36| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Estimated selling price – Estimated selling expense = $120 – $30 = $90. **Net realizable value – Normal profit margin = $90 – $20 = $70. EXERCISE 9-7 (15–20 minutes) Cost Per Lot (Cost Allocated/ No. of Lots)| $2,040| 2,720| 1,360| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cost Allocated to Lots| $18,360| 40,800| 25,840| $85,000| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Cost| $85,000| 85,000| 85,000| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X| X| X| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Relative Sales Price| $27,000/$125,000| $60,000/$125,000| $38,000/$125,000| | | $78,000| 53,040| 24,960| 18,200| $ 6,760| | | Gross Profit| $ 3,840| 10,240| 10,880| $24,960| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Sales Price| $ 27,000| 60,000| 38,000| $125,000| | Sales (see schedule)| Cost of goods sold (see schedule)| Gross profit| Operating expenses| Net income| | | Sales| $12,000| 32,000| 34,000| $78,000| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SalesPrice Per Lot| $3,000| 4,000| 2,000| | | | | | | | | | Cost Cost of Per Lots Lot Sold| $2,040 $ 8,160| 2,720 21,760| 1,360 23,120| $53,040| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | No. of Lots| 9| 15| 19| | | | | | | | | | Number of Lots Sold*| 4| 8| 17| 29| | * 9 – 5 = 4| 15 – 7 = 8| 19 – 2 = 17| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Group 1| Group 2| Group 3| | | | | | | | | | | Group 1| Group 2| Group 3| Total| | | | | EXERCISE 9-12 (10–15 minutes) a)| Inventory, May 1 (at cost)| | $160,000| | Purchases (at cost)| | 640,000| | Purchase discounts| | (12,000)| | Freight-in| | 30,000| | Goods available (at cost)| | 818,000| | Sales (at selling price)| $1,000,000| | | Sales returns (at selling price)| (70,000)| | | Net sales (at selling price)| 930,000| | | Less: Gross profit (25% of $930,000)| 232,500| | | Sales (at cost)| | 697,500| | Approximate inventory, May 31 (at cost)| | $120,500| (b)Gross profit as a percent of sales must be computed: | 25%| = 20% of sales. | | 100% + 25%| | | Inventory, May 1 (at cost)| | $160,000| Purchases (at cost)| | 640,000| | Purchase discounts| | (12,000)| | F reight-in| | 30,000| | Goods available (at cost)| | 818,000| | Sales (at selling price)| $1,000,000| | | Sales returns (at selling price)| (70,000)| | | Net sales (at selling price)| 930,000| | | Less: Gross profit (20% of $930,000)| 186,000| | | Sales (at cost)| | 744,000| | Approximate inventory, May 31 (at cost)| | $ 74,000| | | | | EXERCISE 9-14 Beginning inventory| | $170,000| Purchases| | 450,000| | | 620,000| Purchase returns| | (30,000)| Goods available (at cost)| | 590,000|Sales| $650,000| | Sales returns| (24,000)| | Net sales| 626,000| | Less: Gross profit (30% X $626,000)| (187,800)| 438,200| Estimated ending inventory (unadjusted for damage)| | 151,800| Less: Goods on hand—undamaged (at cost) $21,000 X (1 – 30%)| | (14,700)| Less: Goods on hand—damaged (at net realizable value)| | (5,300)| Fire loss on inventory| | $131,800| EXERCISE 9-19 (12–17 minutes) | Cost| | Retail| Beginning inventory| $ 200,000| | $ 280,000| Purchases| 1,425,000| | 2, 140,000| Totals| 1,625,000| | 2,420,000| Add: Net markups| | | |Markups| | $95,000| | Markup cancellations| _________| (15,000)| 80,000| Totals| $1,625,000| | 2,500,000| | | | | Deduct: Net markdowns| | | | Markdowns| | 35,000| | Markdown cancellations| | (5,000)| 30,000| Sales price of goods available| | | 2,470,000| Deduct: Sales| | | 2,250,000| Ending inventory at retail| | | $ 220,000| Cost-to-retail ratio =| $1,625,000| = 65%| | $2,500,000| | Ending inventory at cost = 65% X $220,000 = $143,000 | PROBLEM 9-4| | Beginning inventory| | $ 80,000| Purchases| | 290,000| | | 370,000| Purchase returns| | (28,000)|Total goods available| | 342,000| Sales| $415,000| | Sales returns| (21,000)| | | 394,000| | Less: Gross profit (35% of $394,000)| 137,900|   (256,100)| Ending inventory (unadjusted for damage)| | 85,900| Less: Goods on hand—undamaged| | | ($30,000 X [1 – 35%])| | 19,500| Inventory damaged| | 66,400| Less: Salvage value of damaged inventory| | 8,150| Fire loss on inventory| | $ 58,250| CHAPTER 18 EXERCISE 18-2 (15–20 minutes) (a)1. 6/3Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount8,000 Sales8,000 6/5Sales Returns and Allowances600 Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount600 6/7Transportation-Out24Cash24 6/12Cash7,252 Sales Discounts (2% X $7,400)148 Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount7,400 2. 6/3Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount7,840 Sales [$8,000 – (2% X $8,000)]7,840 6/5Sales Returns and Allowances588 Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount [$600 – (2% x $600)]588 6/7Transportation-Out24 Cash24 6/12Cash7,252 Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount7,252 (b)8/5Cash7,400 Accounts Receivable—Ann Mount7,252 Sales Discounts Forfeited (2% X $7,400)148 EXERCISE 18-4 (20–25 minutes) (a)Gross profit recognized in: | 2010| 2011| 2012| Contract price| | $1,600,000| | $1,600,000| | $1,600,000| Costs:| | | | | | |Costs to date| $400,000| | $825,000| | $1,070,000| | Estimated costs to complete| 600,000| 1,000,000| 275,000| 1,100,00 0| 0| 1,070,000| Total estimated profit| | 600,000| | 500,000| | 530,000| Percentage completed to date| | 40%*| | 75%**| | 100%| Total gross profit recognized| | 240,000| | 375,000| | 530,000| Less: Gross profit recognized in previous years| | 0| | 240,000| | 375,000| Gross profit recognized in current year| | $ 240,000| | $ 135,000| | $ 155,000| **$400,000 ? $1,000,000**$825,000 ? 1,100,000 (b)Construction in Process ($825,000 – $400,000)425,000Materials, Cash, Payables, etc. 425,000Accounts Receivable ($900,000 – $300,000)600,000 Billings on Construction in Process600,000 Cash ($810,000 – $270,000)540,000 Accounts Receivable540,000 Construction Expenses425,000 Construction in Process135,000 Revenue from Long-Term Contracts560,000* *$1,600,000 X (75% – 40%) (c)Gross profit recognized in: | 2010| 2011| 2012| Gross profit| $–0–| $–0–| $530,000*| *$1,600,000 – $1,070,000 EXERCISE 18-7 (25–30 minutes) (a)1. Gross pro fit recognized in 2010: Contract price$1,200,000 Costs: Costs to date$280,000Estimated additional costs 520,000 800,000 Total estimated profit400,000 Percentage completion to date ($280,000/$800,000) 35% Gross profit recognized in 2010$ 140,000 Gross profit recognized in 2011: Contract price$1,200,000 Costs: Costs to date$600,000 Estimated additional costs 200,000 800,000 Total estimated profit400,000 Percentage completion to date ($600,000/$800,000) 75% Total gross profit recognized300,000 Less: Gross profit recognized in 2010 140,000 Gross profit recognized in 2011$ 160,000 2. Construction in Process ($600,000 – $280,000)320,000 Materials, Cash, Payables, etc. 20,000 Accounts Receivable ($500,000 – $150,000)350,000 Billings on Construction in Process350,000 Cash ($320,000 – $120,000)200,000 Accounts Receivable200,000 Construction in Process160,000 Construction Expenses320,000 Revenues from Long-Term Contracts480,000* *$1,200,000 X [($600,000 – $280,000) ? $800,000] (b)Income Statement (2011)— Gross profit on long-term construction contract$160,000 Balance Sheet (12/31/11)— Current assets: Receivables—construction in process$180,000* Inventories—construction in process totaling $900,000** less billings of $500,000$400,000 **$180,000 = $500,000 – $320,000 **Total cost to date$600,000 010 Gross profit140,000 2011 Gross profit 160,000 $900,000 EXERCISE 18-11 (15–20 minutes) (a)Computation of gross profit recognized: | 2010| 2011| $370,000 X 34%*| $125,800| | $350,000 X 34%*| | $119,000| $450,000 X 32%**|   Ã‚     | 144,000| | $125,800| $263,000| *($900,000 – $594,000) ? $900,000 **($1,000,000 – $680,000) ? $1,000,000(b)Installment Accounts Receivable—20111,000,000 Installment Sales1,000,000 Cost of Installment Sales680,000 Inventory680,000 Cash800,000 Installment Accounts Receivable, 2010350,000 Installment Accounts Receivable, 2011450,000 Installment Sales1,000,000 Co st of Installment Sales680,000Deferred Gross Profit on Installment Sales, 2011320,000 Deferred Gross Profit on Installment Sales, 2010119,000 Deferred Gross Profit on Installment Sales, 2011144,000 Realized Gross Profit on Installment Sales263,000 Realized Gross Profit on Installment Sales263,000 Income Summary263,000 EXERCISE 18-15 (10–15 minutes) (a)Realized gross profit recognized in 2011 under the installment-sales method of accounting is $83,000. When gross profit is expressed as a percentage of cost, it must be converted to percentage of sales to compute the realized gross profit under the installment-sales method of accounting.Thus, 2010 and 2011 gross profits as a percentage of sales are 20% and 21. 875% respectively. Sale Year|   Ã‚  Gross Profit Percentage  Ã‚  | 2011 Collections| 2011 Realized Profit| 2010| . 25/(1. 00 + . 25) = 20%  | $240,000| $48,000| 2011| . 28/(1. 00 + . 28) = 21. 875%| 160,000| 35,000| | | TOTAL| $83,000| (Note to instructor: The proble m provides gross profit as a percent of cost. ) (b)The balance of â€Å"Deferred Gross Profit† could be reported on the balance sheet for 2011: 1. As a current liability on the theory that it is related to Installment Accounts Receivables that are normally treated as current assets; . As a deferred credit between liabilities and stockholders’ equity. This treatment is criticized because there is no obligation to outsiders; or 3. As an adjustment or offset to the related Installment Accounts Receivable. This is because the deferred gross profit is a part of revenue from installment sales not yet realized. The related receivable will be overstated unless the deferred gross profit is deducted. On the other hand, the amount of deferred gross profit has no direct relationship with the estimated collectibility of the accounts receivable.It is not a settled matter as to the proper classification of â€Å"deferred gross profit† on the balance sheet when the installment- sales method of accounting is used to measure income. As indicated in the text, the FASB in Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6 indicates that it conceptually is an asset valuation. We support the FASB position. (c)Gross profit as a percent of sales in 2010 is 20% (as computed in (a) above); gross profit therefore is $96,000 ($480,000 X . 20) and the cost of 2010 sales is $384,000 ($480,000 – $96,000). Because the amounts collected in 2010 ($130,000) and 2011 ($240,000) do not exceed the total cost of

Expressive Art Essay

â€Å"The Last Supper† found on page 101 is Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece created using tempera on pitch, gesso and mastic as medium. The subject matter of the painting, as the title suggests, is the last meal of Jesus Christ together with his twelve apostles. â€Å"The Last Supper†, strikes its audience with an instant depiction of the momentous scene where (through John) Jesus states, â€Å"Truly, truly, I say to you, one of you will betray me†. The last supper or the meal is characterized by the presence of leavened bread, fish, herb and wine. In addition to this, there are twelve glasses and several plates present; all made from metal that untypically portray the supper of conservative Jews. All the items found in the table or supper are nonobjective arts; they do not represent any other objects. â€Å"The Last Supper† presents a pyramidal composition, where an impression of stability is presented to the audience. Twelve models representing the twelve apostles are divided into groups of three, each having distinct expressive characteristics. Bartholomew, James (the younger) and Andrew, found on the left side of the table, shows expressions of fear or horrification. Andrew provides the most expressive reaction as he holds his hands up, as if expressing a gesture of â€Å"let’s calm down†. Judas, Peter and John form the next group, where Judas’ face is in shadow while cunningly holding a small bag which represents money or his betrayal. Furthermore, both Judas and Jesus reached for bread at the same time. On the other hand, Peter clutches a knife which is pointed away from the back of Judas while his other hand is placed on John’s shoulder. It seems like Peter is asking John, who in return leans towards him, â€Å"Who does he say it is? † In â€Å"The Last Supper†, John is represented by an effeminate model or character due to his modest nature. Christ on the other hand, who is the only calm individual in the scene, is located on the center, serving as the center of balance between the groups of apostles who are in turmoil. Three windows are behind him, where the biggest is placed directly behind him, which may represent a halo. Four doors with varied sizes are placed on each side which gives an impression of space or point of view. Thomas, James (brother of Jesus) and Philip are seen next to Jesus. Thomas who is pointing upward seems to doubt the announcement of Jesus. His other hand is placed on the table between the two apostles as if looking for solid evidence. James and Philip are stunned. James is observed to be looking at the left of hand of Jesus while Philip looked like asking, â€Å"Is it me? † Matthew, Thaddeus and Simon, the last group, all looked surprised or startled. Matthew and Thaddeus seem to be asking Simon about the announcement, who in return answers with his hands showing a gesture of â€Å"I don’t know†. Contrary to Leonardo da Vinci’s â€Å"The Last Supper† is Rembrandt’s â€Å"Three Crosses† created using drypoint and burin technique which can be found in page 78. Due to the technique used by Rembrandt (with an emphasis on using lines), the print is black and white. By engaging on the colors used, a feeling or atmosphere of stark and harsh can be felt. This is an effective method especially since the subject matter is the dramatic death of Jesus Christ on the cross at Golgotha. Moreover, it is the narrative representation of â€Å"darkness covered the earth†, an account of the Crucifixion made by St. Luke. The colors or technique emphasizes on the representation of violence, sadness and hope during the said event. Black represents the dark, evil, lack of wisdom or ignorance. Black served as the background, as if representing how darkness covered the earth. On the other hand, white represents light, the sacrifice of Jesus to save mankind or removal of darkness through Christ. The lines provide emphasis to the light which shined on Jesus Christ and the two murders. Moreover, the light seems to be descending from the heavens or from one light source because of the lines. On the contrary, â€Å"The Last Supper† and â€Å"Three Crosses† are similar, in the sense that both shows confusion among the crowd or apostles and Jesus Christ is the center or cause. Reference â€Å"Art as an Expression†. (2008) Retrieved June 1, 2008.

Dueling Computers

1. Do you think Apples comparison advertising between Mac and PC works? Why or why not? From a personal perspective, it almost seems as thought that everything that Apple does turns to gold in some sort, including their advertising campaign. This campaign better known, as â€Å"Get a Mac† appears to require thought at first glance due to the uncommon nature of comparing two objects, but is truly straightforward. Apples uncharacteristic way for comparison, I believe is the true reason for its success. This advertising ploy is somewhat comical but also gives life to two competitive computer operating systems, which in any case could be uninteresting. With this being said I absolutely think that apples comparison advertising between Mac and PC works, myself being proof. When this advertising campaign began I really did not know much about a Mac mostly due to the computers that I have owned were a PC. When I first saw this campaign the first thing that caught my eye was that PC’s were much more vulnerable to viruses as to Mac’s. Apple did a great job at showing this by simulating two actors as if they were computers. I believe this also caught the eye of the computer illiterate nation as well. These comparison commercials were easy to follow and made a very complicated product easy to understand. 2. How important do you think each of these elements of the commercial is to the campaign’s success: music, actors, dialog, setting, and tone? Although all of these elements work great in creating a successful commercial collectively in other campaigns, but I find some of them are not relevant to the success of Apple. For instance, I myself had to go to YouTube and research the elements of the commercials due to some not as appealing as other were. Music- Generally I think music is a key aspect in commercials and sets the mood for its entirety, but the music in Apple’s advertising campaign was somewhat vague and forgettable. While the music was somewhat dull it did allow for the understanding of the actors dialogue. Actors- Although these actors were not exceptionally well known as a superstar athlete or a movie star, they did appear in some other types of television. This I believe gives the television audience some sort of familiarity with the two actors. The actors did however work well together in showing the differences between the PC and Mac. Dialogue- This commercial used dialogue that a computer illiterate was able to understand. In my life experiences simple and to the point was always the best way of putting things, especially in a business type atmosphere. Setting- The setting of these commercials was a blank background. This I believe is a metaphor for the simplicity and user-friendly Apple products. Tone- The tone of the advertisement was somewhat vague but worked perfectly for Apple and its appearance. I do not think that this was a great element for this advertisement. 3. What audience that is Apple trying to reach with these ads? I believe the simplicity of these adds and Apples products are more focused toward the more technical handicapped individual, especially those of which that still use and own a PC. Their commercials look down on PC’s and give examples of why the apple product is better than others. Apple appears to keep much of their advertising extremely simple and easy to follow.

Evaluate Sainsbury plcs financial strategy Essay - 1

Evaluate Sainsbury plcs financial strategy - Essay Example In spite of these speculations, it has risen to be the leader for the last two decades. Sainsbury has relied heavily on equity capital to finance its operations in the recent past. The management consists of the contributors of the needed capital. Being a company based in United Kingdom, where a company with more than 50% of its capital is considered highly geared, the management made a move in the year 2006 to incorporate high level gearing for the following reasons: This is another significant source of funds for Sainsbury Company. This dividend reinvestment plan allows stakeholders to reinvest their cash dividends through purchasing more shares in the market through a significant prearranged share dealing service. No new shares are allotted under this plan. It involves adding more value to the existing ones through a systematic way in order to achieve a balanced portfolio. The price and value of these shares fluctuate in response to the market waves. Stakeholders are fore warned of this possibility because the reinvested dividends in the form of shares may end up with a value or price that is less than the anticipated. Shareholders may then end up getting less than what they invested. Past performance is a guide to clear shareholders doubts and for those who are not sophisticated enough to understand the fir past performance are advised to seek the assistance of professional financial advisors. To aid in understanding of Sainsbury dividend policy, this paper acknowledges the importance of reviewing theories on dividend policies. With empirical research continuously being conducted by scholars on dividend policy, no consensus has ever emerged has scholars continuously keep disagreeing about the same empirical evidence. They all agree that dividend policy refers to management practices in making decisions on the criteria and amount of dividends to be paid to shareholders overtime. However, three dividend policy

Scientific Method Exercise Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Scientific Method Exercise - Assignment Example The damage caused them to produce sperms for reproduction and hence their population eventually ended (Gould, 1984). Drugs. There was an evolution of flowering plants known as angiosperms which were toxic to the liver. The livers of the dinosaurs were unable to detoxify the substance and their tongues unable to taste the bitterness that would have prevented them from eating them. Disasters. Sunlight was blocked by dust raised by a large asteroid which landed on earth. Temperatures were lowered and photosynthesis could not take place leading to massive loss of the animals (Gould, 1984). It is not a possible hypothesis. There is no way to test the dinosaur to verify about their body temperature being lower or higher than that of the earth and also no way of testing about whether or not they became sterile. This is possible as there is evidence of the dinosaurs being found in contorted positions from liver failure and also being the only mammals to die due to the flowers as the other mammals avoided eating them. It is possible based on research on asteroids falling on the earth during that period. It would also explain the reason the extinction of the dinosaurs happened during the same timeline and not over an extended period of

Reynold Defense Firm Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Reynold Defense Firm - Essay Example Moreover, the communication strategy eliminates issues of delay and client dissatisfaction, which may have adverse impacts on the business activities of the firm. The media channels allow the firm to exploit an environmental advantage since our services don’t discriminate customers on grounds of financial strengths. The call services provide free consultation opportunities a move not experienced with most legal firms. In matters of dependability to offer legal assistance with no emphasis on financial gain, the firm is a winner. Their services get based on the founders numerous encounters with the legal system on issue majoring with DUI. The members of staff have developed efficient communication skills that allow for the delivering of quality responses customized so that it can suit the prevailing situation. Other than the online communication media, the firm has a newsletter that outlines some of the developing issues relating to the legal system. In these newsletters, the firm provides several remedies and measures that people should take when faced with a criminal or DUI charge. Individuals can also email the firm outlining their charges to receive free advice or seek representation in any region in Oregon. All media channels adopted ensure a successful dialog between the clients and a legal representative from the

Do Animals Have Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Do Animals Have Rights - Essay Example These differences do not exclude a person's right to being treated with respect and dignity. Human equal and natural rights are granted merely because we are humans (Regan, 1). However, extending this thinking to animals requires that we examine why they are excluded from the rights that are afforded to human beings. It is not because we perceive them as different. Equality and the moral claim to rights rests not in our willingness to overlook differences, but in our acknowledgement that we have a commonality that unites us into a unique moral class. The sameness that unites the human race is not born out of physical appearance or mental abilities. We treasure our uniqueness and individuality, but they do not make us the same. The attribute that unites our species as unique is our awareness of our status, well being, and self. On the most basic level of awareness, we can measure our differences in our abilities at math or academic pursuits. Our sameness resides outside our mind's ability to calculate and exists in our unconscious. Equality is a moral ideal that eludes the ability to be stated as a simple fact (Singer, 197). We attribute our sameness to our concept of history, our realization of self-awareness, and the ability to feel the emotions of pleasure and pain. These are the qualities that are ascribed to being unique to the human race by those that would argue that animals do not have rights. The human concept of histor... The social structure and survival skills are passed down through generations of an animal society. This is the definition of history that is invoked and kept active by the use of memory. Displays of emotion, as it relates to history, are evident when we observe animal grieving at a family member's death. This is a sense of history as the animal recalls what their relationship meant, and what the coming times will be with the absence of the animal. The human race is not the only animal on the planet that has self-awareness. All animals are aware of their image, their ego, and the limits of their abilities. A dog will groom itself and have an understanding of what it is and what is not the dog. We do not simply treat our pets well out of a sense of obligation, but because of a common spiritual connection (Cohen, 95). All species of animals demonstrate their self-awareness as they display themselves and understand their role in reproduction. The audible and visual manifestations that an animal creates is an expression of that self-awareness. The wide range of emotions felt by animals can be illustrated by the grieving process felt at the time of death. Birds and elephants have complicated rituals they perform at the death of a member of their society. Disappointment and frustration is expressed when an animal is faced with obstacles that require problem solving. The close study of animals has revealed societies where kindness, sharing, guilt, grief, and anger are felt ands expressed on a routine basis. Pain and pleasure are often used as uniquely human qualities that are not shared by animals. However, there is obvious pain when an animal is tortured. Animals show obvious signs of appreciation and happiness